Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 04:57:10 04/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2005 at 07:17:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 29, 2005 at 06:50:46, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>Games 1 and 6 were complex battles in which both sides took huge risks. There is >>this huge fallacy that both games were decided in the opening. Well, maybe for >>God they were, but not for anybody else. >> >>Vas > > >Using God is a blasphemy if every GM has seen at the instant that the opening of >the game 2 was an intentious choice of a deeply handicapped opening without any >active counter chances. You can't deny that Kasparov did a lot to make those >happy who gave him so much money... > >Game Six was Chrismas and Easter on one day... These were just failed attempts at anti-computer play. If you want to see anti-computer play succeed, look at game 6 of the 1996 Kasparov-DBI match. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.