Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Delirious?

Author: blass uri

Date: 13:33:28 02/06/99

Go up one level in this thread



On February 06, 1999 at 15:22:34, Paulo Soares wrote:

>On February 06, 1999 at 13:07:38, blass uri wrote:
>
>>
>>On February 06, 1999 at 12:48:09, Paulo Soares wrote:
>>
>>>Could a chess player with rating FIDE below of the 2000
>>>points ELO
>>
>>I think that there are no players with fide rating below 2000
>>If the performance of a player is below 2000 then the player has no fide rating.
>>
>>, win Kasparov with the aid of a program line top
>>>running on a PC(for example, a PII-450 with 120Mb RAM), in one
>>>match 2/40?
>>>	I believe that yes, it will be that I am being delirious?
>>
>>I have a fide rating 2020 and I believe that I cannot win kasparov with the aid
>>of a program.
>>
>
>
>Uri
>
>	Some advantages that the player would have over Kasparov:
>1- It would have eventually the possibility to choose an opened variant,
>   with tactical game in any phase of the game.

It is not so simple kasparov will try to play in anti computer style and the
result of tries to avoid a closed position can be a win for kasparov because the
open position may be better for Kasparov and Kasparov is good at tactics and may
win because of his advantage even in an open position.

>2- To analyze with more depth any position.
If I give the computer lines and analyze them during the game then I can miss a
surprising move that the computer could find after some time so the result may
be worse than the computer without help.

I think it is better to try it against other programs before the match against
kasparov.

>3- the fatigue of Kasparov along the game.
>4- The advantage of the time from thirtieth fifth move(if obtains to arrive
>   in that phase).

I think that Kasparov will be careful not to get to time trouble against the
system computerhuman.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.