Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 10:42:05 05/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2005 at 13:05:37, Pallav Nawani wrote: >On May 06, 2005 at 12:12:56, Brian Kostick wrote: > >>On May 06, 2005 at 11:24:24, Alex Schmidt wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>after some Mails with Fabien and Frank we decided that some of the proves about >>>Patriot 2.0 must be available for the public. >>> >>>I am not happy in doing so but here it is: >>> >>>http://www.uciengines.de/UCI-Engines/Patriot/Patriot2/patriot2.html >>> >>>Best, >>>Alex >> >> >>I don't see it as wrong behavior. If you feel he has used GPL'ed code then you >>are free to ask for a copy and he is required to make it available. Otherwise I >>see some sort of credit or disclosure as only a honorary, not compulsory, thing. >>BK > >If you use GPL code in your program, you must: >(a) License your own program as GPL, >(b) State in your License/Somewhere about the the program whose code you are >using, >(c) Either make the Source Code available, or state in your documentation that >you will make it available if asked to do so. > >There is nothing honorary here. >Pallav I'm glad we agree, but already you might assume he violates the GPL. I did not make that assumption. I suggested that you ask for a copy and he should give it if the code is GPL'ed. Too many reverse engineers and CCC clone police go public before trying the simple method. BK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.