Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: New York 1924

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:13:14 05/23/05

Go up one level in this thread

On May 21, 2005 at 07:42:00, Peter Berger wrote:

>On May 20, 2005 at 20:49:42, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>Capablanca was clearly the strongest of the group.
>
>Pardon? It's hard to remember a top tournament in history that was more clearly
>dominated by a player than New York 1924 by Lasker.

You're right.  And from 1924-1927, Lasker may have been the stronger:
http://www.chessmetrics.com/CM2/MonthlyLists.asp?Params=191030SSSSS3S000000000000111000000000000010100

>Actually I also think that Shredder couldn't have outperformed him.

There, I have no idea.

• Re: New York 1924 Darrel Briley 05:25:38 05/24/05
  • Re: New York 1924 - Correction Darrel Briley 05:34:02 05/24/05
    • Re: New York 1924 - Correction Dann Corbit 07:38:49 05/24/05
      • Re: New York 1924 - Correction Darrel Briley 12:15:15 05/24/05
        • Re: New York 1924 - Correction Dann Corbit 19:47:53 05/24/05
          • Re: New York 1924 - Correction Darrel Briley 20:26:50 05/24/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.