Author: Andres Valverde
Date: 14:32:37 05/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2005 at 18:36:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: >More or less it is because of this: I do not play tennis, I have not ever in my >life take a racket, but if I do not show myself in a lawn against Federer, I >will avoid a lose no matter what. >Anti-computer is in a way not to play chess. Not playing chess at all, you >cannot lose a game of chess. But it is sure that Federer will beat you anyway you play, that's the point >The GM try to play chess and so he puts himself in a position with a risk to >lose. So he can be beaten. >Anti-computer chess is nonsense. Better way not to lose to a computer is not to >play a computer at all and besides you save time. >I purchase or get programs or dedicated units to play and get fun, no matter if >I never win a game. The core of the issue is the fun. Don't you agree? >Do not worry anymore about anticomputer hoopla and just play and enjoy. Humans enjoy life in many ways. The pleasure of defeating/drawing engines in such antichess style might be one of them, dont you think so? ;) NOTA: Si pasas por Almeria, Sudeste de España, contactame. He visto tu mensaje mas arriba al respecto :) >Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.