Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Semi-OT Go programming

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 08:17:56 05/25/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 25, 2005 at 09:10:36, Vasik Rajlich wrote:

>I think that which game you prefer is a sort of basic personality test, for
>whether you like
>
>1) short-term or long-term thinking
>2) clear-cut or open-ended problems
>3) clear or vague feedback
>4) to move from one micro-problem to another or to stick to one persistent theme
>
>etc ..

This all makes a lot of sense.  I am an awful go player and a worse than
awful as a chess player, but to me go feels like a more artistic and less
scientific game.  This is partly because deep, exact calculations alone
does not bring you as far as in chess, and partly because the bigger
branching factor makes room for a bigger variety of unique and personal
playing styles.  Given a handful of games by a top go player and a top
chess player, I think it would be much easier to guess the identity of
the go player by observing the style of play.

Perhaps this is all because I am even worse at chess than at go.  It would
be interesting to hear what stronger players of both games think about this.

>Apparently it's been shown that chess players use only one half of their brains
>during play (the half responsible for logical thinking), while go players use
>both halves.

Interesting, but somewhat surprising to me.  Visualisation skills must be
important in both games, and I thought visualisation skills were usually
located in the opposite brain half of logical thinking.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.