Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:17:35 05/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2005 at 16:09:10, Tony Werten wrote: >On May 25, 2005 at 15:40:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On May 25, 2005 at 10:33:32, emerson tan wrote: >> >>>Why did hydra team chose adams? Leko and kramnik styles seem to more appropriate >>>against a computer. Anand is also well adapted to play against a computer. I >>>like to see if hydra can defeat Kramnik's berlin wall. Anand keep on exchanging >>>pieces against a computer before that with very few materials. it wasnt able to >>>create winning chances. >> >> >> Nobody except the Hydra team will know. We can however >> expect an interesting match providet Adams plays for >> a win. >> Kurt > >Maybe. OTOH it also might be interesting to see if he can draw. Humans that not >play for a win seem to be hard to defeat. > >Humans that not play for a win but recognize a change to win without a danger of >losing have the best chance to beat a computer imo. Most humans however seem to >forget this strategy after winning 1 game. > >But still, if Adams can draw any game at will, chessprograms still have a long >way to go. > >Tony If Adams can draw any game at will then I can congratulate him for solving chess. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.