Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 09:41:24 05/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2005 at 11:18:05, Matthew Hull wrote: >On May 28, 2005 at 10:46:48, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On May 27, 2005 at 18:02:25, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 27, 2005 at 17:54:57, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Hello Thomas >>>>I would like to see playing into playchess engines room, to Dr. Robert Hyatt >>>>engines. >>>>For me is a problem to play into ICC because I have not premoves into ICC, and >>>>as a guest if there are disconnection immediately I will be lost. >>>>I would like to play a challenger (just for fun and for testing engines to be >>>>better engines and of course me too) into playchess against Crafty from Dr >>>>Robert Hyatt and against Quark, if could be possible into main room better for >>>>everyone. >>>>Unique way for me to discover new ways will be playing in long time controls. >>>>This has been a dream for me Thomas. >>>>Best regard, >>>>Pablo >>> >>>If I understand correctly >>>I understand that engines lose on time automatically at move 257 in playchess >>>and that this problem is not engine problem but interface problem. >>> >>>I think that if this problem is not fixed then engines suffer from unfair >>>conditions in playchess. >>> >>>Uri >> >>It seems that maybe you don't understand the technique. >> >>A human with pre-move (and just enough lag) will always win a closed position on >>time if the game is long enough - regardless of time control (as long as there >>is no increment), and regardless of anything that happens on move 257. > > >Bob Hyatt says crafty will never lose on time this way. So far, Pablo has not >been able to win against crafty on ICC with this technique. > > >> >>Vas Let me show you how to do it :) Vas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.