Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:59:26 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2005 at 08:40:31, Cesar Contreras wrote: >>The proofs shown would be enough for every court. > >Not be so sure, as you can see many people think your probes are inconclusive. >Thanks god on most countries justice it's a little more advanced than this. > >>The probability that an engine have the same behaviour in all of the above cases >>is 0,0000000005% (one of 2 Billion), and it's calculated in order to be on the >>safe side. > >How did you got this number? I think it's unfounded. Very simple 0.02*0.01*0.01*0.1*0.05*0.05=1/2,000,000,000 The numbers 2% or 1% or 5% or 10% are already mentioned in his post. > >>didn't try to explain one of the similaries this are enough proofs for me. > >I don't have fafis source to really determine if it's a clone or not. All i have >are your inconclusive evidence and the fact that i think rafael really knows >about chess programming, he is able to make a chess engine from scratch. It proves nothing. A programmer can also make a clone and make a chess engine from scratch. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.