Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Amir, your question implies disbelief

Author: Rex

Date: 08:49:08 05/30/05

Go up one level in this thread


On May 30, 2005 at 09:32:18, K. Burcham wrote:

>On May 30, 2005 at 02:02:49, Amir wrote:
>
>>Deep Blue could calculate 200 million moves per second. According to what I have
>>read, Hydra calculates 40 million moves per second. How then is Hydra sees
>>deeper or is faster than Deep Blue, as is claimed by the authors??
>
>I think you are trying to say the authors claim is not true.
>All of the answers to your post, you already know.
>You understand both machines as much as most here do.
>
>Amir, question for you: How then is Hydra sees deeper or is faster than Deep
>Blue, as is claimed by the authors??
>
>kburcham


Why is deeper, better, if piece and positional evaluation may NOT be accurate?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.