Author: David Dahlem
Date: 09:50:08 05/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
>Like I mentioned in another post , there are lot of innocent people who get >convicted on the basis of circumstantial evidence There seems to be some kind of idea that 'circumstantial' evidence is 'weak' evidence. In fact, that is not the case! Regards Dave (more so in fiction than real >life) , you will get the punishment not because of the fault in the legal system >but because of your inability to defend. >The system is not making a preconcieved notion that you are innocent/guilty : >sometimes life just sucksand you happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong >time doing and saying the wrong things. > >Mridul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.