Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 05:57:18 06/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2005 at 07:56:55, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 01, 2005 at 07:22:01, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>On June 01, 2005 at 07:17:46, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>>>>He is the weakest among the top 10 and a good choice by Hydra Team. >>>>> >>>>>He is number 7, so he is not the weakest, and even if he was, how would that >>>>>justify such a nonsense statement as "Adams is a weak GM" ? >>>> >>>>I did not say he is a weak GM >>> >>>But you supported the view. >>>You also said that he is the weakest of the top 10 and i pointed out to you that >>>he is number 7... >>> >>>>but not the best choice if u want to see real Man >>>>vs Machine Contest. >>> >>>Please define _real_ man v machine contest. >> >>Where the best of Man and Machine are facing each other and by no means Adamss >>is the best Player at the moment. It has to be Topalov or Anand or Leko or >>Kramnik. > > A very strange way of thinking in my opinion. In that > case you have only been interested in games Kasparaov > vs Ananand and from now in in games between Anand and > Topalov ?? All other games are no "real" matches -:) > Kurt Will these games be devoid of blunders that the best Human is most unlikely to make against Hydra? If Adams wins this match I will definitely think that Kasparov vs Deep Blue 1998 was fixed. Regards Vikrant
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.