Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 21:01:44 06/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2005 at 10:45:58, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>Being weakest among top 10 does not mean Adams is a weak GM,(in fact it means he >>is relly good. There are really very talented people in 10-20.) >>But he is not the best. He plays realy(Linares vs Anand) well in patches and it >>will be really tough for him to beat Hydra. > >But being number 7 in the world, does not make him the weakest top 10 player, >you agree? Against Machine, i think he is the weakest as in the past all man vs Machine matches have been decided by Blunders. Well he has the biggest chance of making a blunder going by his losses to Kasimdazov in Tripoli and recent games. Bt It can b proven wrong if he prepares well in the Opening and out manuveres Hydra in the opening cos Hydra uses a relatively small Opening Book. One other disadvantage is that Adams can go through the Games of the Hydra whciah were played by 16 processor clustor and not the 32 Processor monster, whether he will be able to find any weaknesses? I doubt that the same weaknesses will be there in 32 processor clustor that is going to play the match.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.