Author: Michael Diosi
Date: 11:45:18 06/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2005 at 14:19:35, Peter Skinner wrote: >On June 02, 2005 at 13:55:31, Michael Diosi wrote: > >>Also the compressor of Fafis 2.0 is known and is not a binder. Molebox was used. > >MoleBox _is_ a binder that combines exe, dll, among other files together without >damaging the original file. It can also compress/encrypt the file, and install >without decompressing. > >http://www.molebox.com/ <-- read it. It _is_ a binder. MoleBox is a runtime exe packer for Windows applications. Fafis is compressed and encrypted with MoleBox it appears. AVG say the file is not bound with anything. The worm is in the code according to them. AVG say the file is just compressed and encrypted. The worm is in the source. What do you not understand about this ? >>2) http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67828/messages/1565.htm means that the correct >>source was not given >> for inpection and even then is still exceptionally similar to Crafty. >> >>3) He wanted to sell this as beeing HIS work! > >Fine. Then Fafis is a clone. I still _highly_ doubt Rafael would purposely put a >worm in his own file. There is no logic to it. Didn't you tell us it was not a clone ? What made you change your mind ? It is no hunt it is about helping people getting rid of the virus and closing their still open port. Nothing more and nothing less. > >Is the witch hunt of for you and Chris? If so, then my only question is... > >Who's next on your list? I can only see you hunting us. Till now we have said the truth: Patriot is a clone, Fafis is a clone, you had no written permision from Martin to put Arena on your page which you did. >Peter Best, Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.