Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 09:59:06 06/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2005 at 12:10:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 05, 2005 at 11:37:36, Theo van der Storm wrote: > >>[Event "ICT5"] >>[Site "Leiden NED"] >>[Date "2005.06.05"] >>[Round "9"] >>[White "Ant"] >>[Black "Shredder"] >>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >> >>1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bxc4 e6 5. Nf3 a6 >>6. O-O c5 7. Bd3 Nbd7 8. Re1 b6 9. e4 cxd4 10. e5 Nd5 >>11. Nxd4 Bb7 12. Nxe6 fxe6 13. Qh5 Ke7 14. Bxh7 Qc7 15. Bg5 N5f6 >>16. exf6 gxf6 17. Bd2 Qc5 18. Qxc5 Nxc5 19. Bc2 Rd8 20. Be3 Bh6 >>21. f4 Nd3 22. Bxd3 Rxd3 23. g3 Bg7 24. Nc3 Bf3 25. h4 f5 >>26. Bxb6 Rb8 27. Bc5 Kf7 28. Rab1 Bxc3 29. bxc3 Rxb1 30. Rxb1 Bd5 >>31. Bf2 Rxc3 32. Ra1 Ra3 33. Kf1 Kg6 34. Ke2 a5 35. Kd2 >>1/2-1/2 > >My Shredder cannot reproduce 11...Bb7 at analysis mode(Ant could win easily >after that blunder and Shredder shows +3 for white after 13...Ke7) > >It seems that Shredder was handicapped by using a big book and I do not >understand the reason for it. > >Analysis by Shredder 9 UCI: > >14.Bxh7 > ³ (-0.60) Depth: 1/1 00:00:00 >14.Nd2 > = (-0.23) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >14.Nd2 > = (-0.23) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ > +- (2.76) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 > +- (2.76) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 2/6 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 4/8 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 5/10 00:00:00 >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 6/20 00:00:00 2kN >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 7/20 00:00:00 6kN >14.Bg5+ N7f6 15.Nd2 h6 16.Bf5 Bc8 17.exf6+ gxf6 18.Bh4 Rg8 > +- (2.76) Depth: 8/23 00:00:00 20kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.Bc4 Nc5 16.Nd2 Qc7 17.Rad1 Rd8 18.Qh3 Qc6 19.exf6+ > +- (2.77) Depth: 9/33 00:00:01 195kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 > +- (3.02) Depth: 10/33 00:00:03 433kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.Bc4 Nc5 16.Nd2 Kd7 17.exf6 gxf6 18.Bf4 Qe8 19.Qh3 Rg8 > +- (3.05) Depth: 10/33 00:00:03 597kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.Bc4 Nc5 16.Nd2 Kd7 17.exf6 gxf6 18.Bf4 Qe8 19.Qh4 Rg8 20.Qxh7+ >Rg7 > +- (3.00) Depth: 11/38 00:00:05 1616kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.Bc4 Nc5 16.Nd2 Qc7 17.Qh4 Kf7 18.exf6 g6 > +- (3.24) Depth: 12/45 00:00:14 6735kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.Bc4 Nc5 16.Nd2 Kd7 17.exf6 gxf6 18.Rad1 Kc7 19.Nf3 Bd6 > +- (3.10) Depth: 13/45 00:00:41 20701kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 15.exf6+ gxf6 16.Bc4 Nc5 17.Be3 Ne4 18.Nd2 Rc8 19.Rad1 Qc7 20.Nxe4 >Bxe4 21.Bxa6 Rd8 22.Bd4 > +- (3.31) Depth: 14/46 00:01:41 52334kN >14.Bg5+ N5f6 > +- (3.56) Depth: 15/46 00:02:42 83574kN >14.Bg5+ N7f6 > +- (3.56) Depth: 15/48 00:05:25 173864kN > >(, 05.06.2005) Yes, this is an old story, also from Hydra-Shredder match, etc. Shredder is able to keep its top spot among PC programs in spite of many flaws .. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.