Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 12:12:36 06/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2005 at 09:31:51, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 12, 2005 at 18:42:15, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>ha this seems like a joke, reporting that great result with so much naturality. >> >>I'm thinking some day I could post a list like this, if somebody believe me: >> >>"I was just in the middle of the testing of the last version of my engine. I am >>not sure about the sufficiency of the number of games needed to be played to get >>statistical significance, what do you think: >> >>1 Amyan1.7b : 2780 111 111 35 68.6 % 2689 20.0 % >>2 Amyan1.7a : 2761 113 89 36 65.6 % 2692 33.3 % >>3 Shredder9UCI : 2698 119 90 35 45.9 % 2697 31.4 % >>4 Ruffian_105 : 2656 95 117 35 40.7 % 2706 28.6 % >>5 Spike09a : 2606 96 105 35 29.1 % 2718 34.3 % > >I think that Shredder's rating is lower than 2697 if shredder scored only 45.9% >against average rating of 2697 so the gap between amyan and shredder is bigger >and you underestimate amyan:-( oops you are right
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.