Author: Kai Skibbe
Date: 04:34:29 02/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 1999 at 06:44:01, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On February 15, 1999 at 17:58:31, Ricardo Sant Ana wrote: > >>Hello all >>When will we see these both programs on ssdf ? I believe cm6000 will get good >>result because I believe the faster the machine , better for tactics programs ! >> >>But I would prefer others programs like rebel10 or Hiarcs 7 (maybe!) > >Rebel10 have no autoplayer and Ed Schröder don't want us to test it. Hiarcs7 is >number one on our list. > >>What will you win by playing againg a tactical program like cm 6000 ? > >Can you explain this statement of yours. Shouldn't we test any more tactical >programs? And what can we loose or win when testing whatever program. By the >way, I don't consider CM6000 tactical. It's more of a positionell player, human >like. > >>anyway, it >>would be interesting to see it on ssdf. > >We've played 45 games so far. > >>What about crafty ? The last I heard about it was a tourn where it got bad >place because there were a BUG on it !!! > >That's the issue. Crafty just come as an engine to Fritz/Chessbase GUI. And it >seems that it can't play at its full power in that environment. > The newest engine of Crafty is 16.4T and this version doesn´t clear the hashtables and uses tablebases. I have played 14 games against Junior5.0 and Crafty scored a 6-8( 4 draws, 4 wins for Crafty and 6 wins for Junior ). Level was 40moves/40minutes with pb=off on a AMD-K6II-333MHz. The only "disadvantage" for crafty was that I have to use the general-book for crafty. Best regards Kai >>Comments ? >> >>Thanks >>Ricardo > >Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.