Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 07:58:42 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
>At this time, I do not believe that Hydra beat GM Michael Adams, 2737, in match >play. >At this time I do not believe the results of this match. >At this time I believe that someone has an agenda that I am not aware of. >At this time I believe that money has influenced the match results. > >At this time I do not believe that all GM and Super GM that watched and/or have >analysed these games are saying: "damn I cannot believe these moves and >positions that the machine was able to play, this is truely 2700 Super GM play". > >Webster: skepticism >a : the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is >uncertain >b : the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism >characteristic of skeptics. > >http://www.fide.com/ratings/toparc.phtml?cod=77 >http://www.fide.com/ratings/card.phtml?event=400041 > >kburcham To be honest i think that you are way off here and the funny thing is that there will always be someone suggesting foul play no matter what happens, either it is suspicious that the results a very similar (often the matches in the past have been drawn) or some other angle. I am starting to feel like there is a hidden agenda behind these "theories" :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.