Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 17:54:20 02/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 1999 at 19:36:13, Fernando Villegas wrote: <snip> >Maybe Bionic or Voyager have 99% of components from Crafty, but if the behaviour >is not like Crafty, then is not Crafty. A chess program is for playing chess and >so matters of style and strenght are the important ones, no how was done, how >many new or olds pieces has, etc. <snip> This seems very wrong. For example, I can take Crafty source and add *ONLY TWO LINES* and make it play completely differently, yet still very strongly. But, I CAN NOT claim the program to be my own. Even though you wouldn't be able to tell it was Crafty by looking at the games it played, it still would be Crafty. As Dann said, if I take one of your articles and change a few words, it is still YOUR article, even if nobody would be able to tell you wrote it. Jeremiah
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.