Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The correlation between Standard and Chess960 is not parallel

Author: Reinhard Scharnagl

Date: 03:37:31 06/28/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 28, 2005 at 06:26:46, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On June 28, 2005 at 02:04:27, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote:
>
>>I am sorry about the fact, that Smirf's growing abilities are tested nearly by
>>nobody. Some feed back could be very helpful.
>
>Hi Reinhard,
>
>Yes, I know the problem.  Like you, I happen to like chess variants, and I
>have written two chess variant programs (for FRC and hexagonal chess).  My
>experience is the same as yours:  Almost nobody are interested in chess
>variants.  My FRC engine has been available to the public for about one
>year, and so far only one (!) user have been provided me with feedback.  In
>contrast, the equivalent non-FRC engine is extremely popular, and I still
>occasionally receive games and comments from users, despite not having
>released a new version since last summer.
>
>The situation for the hexagonal chess program is slightly better, but not
>much.  It was released a few months ago, and only a handful of users have
>contacted me.  The sad truth is that the vast majority of users don't care
>about anything else than normal chess.
>
>I think the easiest way for you to get lots of feedback would be to release
>a special version of your program without any chess variant support, but
>with support for the UCI or xboard protocol.  I am sure a lot of people
>would be very interested.

Tord,

probably I will do it, when UCI officially supports Chess960.

Reinhard.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.