Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 23:12:15 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 22:47:33, gerold daniels wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 08:10:24, Amir wrote: > >>On June 28, 2005 at 06:43:31, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >> >> >>>Also what Pablo achieved on Playchess.com and numerous Engines beating Hydra was >>>at fast time control and are irrelevent at longer time controls against Hydra. >> >>Comps are stronger than humans at faster time control, so if someone does well >>against comps at faster time control, he would do even better at slower time >>control. > >Hi Amir, got to disagree on this one. a lot of people can play and beat computer >on fast time control. they play for draw and for win on time. >most of the chess players i have seen and the games that have been posted >were play very poor. most players i know that play for time wins cannot play >a good classical chess game. But if you look at it statistically, you will see that the faster the game, the higher the computed Elo value will be for machines, and opposite for humans. Correspondence chess is (possibly) the last bastion for human chess supremacy, and that must eventually fall also.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.