Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 06:34:40 07/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2005 at 06:10:20, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that things may be also dependent on time control and on the question if >you use ponder off or ponder on. Pondering probably has some importance. Glaurung's time management doesn't work quite as well with ponder on. This would be easy to fix, but I've been too lazy so far. I think Glaurung's strength no longer depends very much on the time control, though. The CEGT results are not too different from the various blitz rating lists. >For some reason Glaurung does not do well in Leo's tournament. I think it does quite OK. It is near the middle of the very strong 1st division, and I see no reason to complain about that. >I know that old 0.2.2j is used there but older version(0.2.1) promoted to the >king class with ponder off and faster time control than WBEC and it is logical >to expect 0.2.2j to be stronger than 0.2.1 Not much. If I recall correctly, the differences between these two versions are very small. I think 0.2.4 should be around 50-80 Elo points stronger than both. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.