Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:09:19 07/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2005 at 19:11:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 18:31:35, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>On July 04, 2005 at 16:51:34, I Hart SanQuentin wrote: >> >>>On July 04, 2005 at 16:00:14, Andrew Williams wrote: >>> >>>>On July 04, 2005 at 15:57:13, I Hart SanQuentin wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 04, 2005 at 13:17:05, Andrew Williams wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 04, 2005 at 12:59:18, I Hart SanQuentin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Ferret;s own words "I could have been a contenda!" No more though the chance >>>>>>>has been blown, all kinds of amateur programs can eat ferret alive, now it's not >>>>>>>sellable it'd not even a name anymore. Release Ferret don't let it live out >>>>>>>it's final days in slavery on Bruce morelands back up harddrive. Let it roam >>>>>>>and have a family get to play with some kids or something. Free that slave, it >>>>>>>has no commercial value it's old and done for. >>>>>> >>>>>>Just a quick pointer: most people here will think you are an idiot because you >>>>>>are posting stuff without using your real name. That's even before you start >>>>>>trash-talking chess programs. >>>>>> >>>>>>Andrew Williams >>>>> >>>>>The United college fund for chess programs is shocked and refers you to another >>>>>foundation. They say "A mind is a terrible thing to waste", In your case >>>>>though it's just an example that "A mind is a terrible thing". >>>> >>>>Just a quick pointer: most people here will think you are an idiot because you >>>>are posting stuff without using your real name. >>>> >>>>Andrew >>> >>>The United college fund for chess programs is shocked and refers you to another >>>foundation. They say "A mind is a terrible thing to waste", In your case >>>though it's just an example that "A mind is a terrible thing". >>> >>>All the ghost writers in the history of the world must be idiots " Pulitzer >>>prize winner O'Henry, Harriet Beacher Stowe, Nelson Mandella. Not that a >>>rational person can come up with a rational connection between intelligence and >>>people knowing there name. I assume then that you are calling all people who >>>would assume such a connection idiots because such a connection is clearly >>>irrational. >>> >> >>When you signed up to this club you agreed to post under your real name: >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/signup.html >> >>You choose to post idiotic messages using an assumed name, even though you >>agreed to use your real name when you signed up. My conclusion is that most >>people here will believe that you are an idiot. If you were using your real >>name, they might at least give you the benefit of the doubt. Comparing yourself >>with ghostwriters doesn't make sense in this context, unless someone is paying >>you to write your messages here; I don't think that is very likely. >> >>The reason I have a bee in my bonnet about anonymous posting is that I don't >>think that you would post idiotic messages here if you were using your real >>name. Either way, ask yourself, "why am I using an assumed name?". >> >>Andrew > >I expect real idiot to post idiotic messages under his real name. >If the poster decided not to use his real name because he posts idiotic messgaes >then it means that he knows that his messgaes are idiotic and >I expect an idiot not to know it. However, it's not an if and only if relation. It is also possible for a true idiot to use an assumed name.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.