Author: William Sorin
Date: 15:18:08 07/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2005 at 08:34:22, Amir wrote: >On July 11, 2005 at 08:02:07, Gabor Szots wrote: > >>On July 11, 2005 at 07:42:24, Amir wrote: >> >>>On July 10, 2005 at 23:55:04, Zappa wrote: >>> >>>>I have seen nothing from you about why I should give Pablo a match, only that "I >>>>am scared" - and I suspect that was you trying your best to sink my match with >>>>Ehlvest, since Pablo claims he didn't do it. So, I will give you a chance: >>>>Please tell me why I should play Pablo Restrepo in a match. >>> >>>The question is why won't you play him? >> >>Wrong question. You might as well ask him why he won't play me. Or you. Or >>everybody here. >>You might as well ask Klitschko why he won't agree to a box match against me. >>Probably out of fear. :-) > >If you have proven to be good at drawing regularly top engines, and you >challenge him to a match, and he doesn't play you, sure it could be fear :) I >don't think I can draw as many games as Pablo does. Though I don't play >anti-comp closed stonewall setups. Moreover, every time someone plays stonewall >against me, I usually succeed in exchanging my bad Bishop (c1 or c8), plant my >Knight on e4/e5, followed by f4/f5 (depending on whether I am black or white), >and end up with winning position (good knight versus bad Bishop). I am not a >fan of Stonewall. It's not good especially if I know you are going to play it. > >Anyway, remember Pablo is not just "anyone". He has proven himself to be better >than even strong masters against comps. And when has Pablo elected you to be his spokesman? Or are you two banging each other?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.