Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 05:00:03 07/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2005 at 07:40:47, Mathieu Pagé wrote: >At least, I understand your point. I already thougt of an engine with two >evaluation function one two maximize and one to predict the opponent's move. I >never tried it but I came to the conclusion that it would not be as efficient as >one using only an evaluation function since one of thoses two evaluation >function would be weaker than the other. that is the wrong (or better misleading) view. It is merely a question of different playing styles. >However, my actual idea does not imply two evaluation function. It just imply >that against a particular opponent the engine would use a different evaluation >function and a different book than against another oponent. > >Look at this post from Jay Scott : >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?436722 he seem to better express >my idea than I can. You probably already understand that i'm not a native >english speaker. Mee too. Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.