Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 03:35:07 07/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2005 at 05:33:39, Andrew Williams wrote: >On July 15, 2005 at 10:31:33, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: > >>SSDF has been replaced by CEGT. They are quicker, include strong freeware, and >>do not follow the 40/2h dogma. >> >>http://www.cegt.de/rangliste/cegtall.html >> >>Steve > >I think that you want to "replace" SSDF, you need to at least reach the point >where people have heard of you! SSDF is very well respected. CEGT is just >another rating list, as far as I can see. That's not to denigrate the work that >is being done by the CEGT team, but you shouldn't go around talking about >"replacing" SSDF until you've earned a lot more respect in the community. All >IMHO of course. > >Andrew Steve is not the only one for me CEGT is already a better and more accurate alternative to SSDF: They test more engines, they do it faster, they play more games, they use different GUIs, they test the engine capability rather than a clever designed package (opening book, learning, etc.). The slightly slower time limit is not a problem or me. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.