Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 16:07:11 02/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 1999 at 14:15:36, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 18, 1999 at 07:42:12, Fernando Villegas wrote: >[snip] >>Thank you Dann. No,I did not take an offense from you, but yes, It was somewhat >>painful to be considered unworthy of discussion because of a wrong and maybe >>malevolent opinion of someone here. And yes, worl is wide enough for all of us. >>And a lot of thanks again for your desires. i love you too. >It is not a question of human worth or dignity. I consider all humans as equal >value, including yourself. I also do not denigrate your opinions or motives. I >only feel in a case such as this both of us have strong opinions and neither >will be swayed by the opinions of the other. Dann: Funny enough, in fact I am not a man of too strong convictions about almost nothing. I tend to be convinced by the last elegant, intelligent argument it happens I lesson. And I am very good at seeing the other side and so to become somewhat doubtfoul of my own ideas of yesterday. So my only one conviction is; truth is multifaceted thing and our truth is ever local and parcial, if sometime that is enough for our purposes. Fernando > >Having strong opinions is a kind of passion, and I think it is good. I do, >occasionally, have a big reversal in opinion. This is not going to be one of >those times. I'm also absurdly stubborn at times. > >At any rate, I don't want you to feel that I was looking down on you or >considering you as unworthy for discussion in some way. I just thought that it >would not be the best allocation of time to debate something of which we are >both already convinced.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.