Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 03:48:28 02/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 1999 at 05:51:34, Harald Faber wrote: > ... > >3) strength > We can discuss if I will ever beat Shredder1-3 but one always wants the best > program to get the best analysis (e.g.) > Shredder has/had some highlights of course, but all in all I think it is a >bit behind. Maybe Sherdder can compete with other programs, I don't know, but > at the moment I am running a match against Hiarcs7 which doesn't look well >although Shredder has a speed advantage of 50%. So far: > Hiarcs7: 11.0, Shredder3: 7.0 > (Shredder on K6-200/24+8MB hash, Hiarcs7 on MMX166/47MB hash, 40/120+rest/60) > Harald, I think that this is just wrong. Look for instance at Enrique's tournament where Shredder-3 competed very well with the current top programs. Your result 11:7 is not statistically significant. At best you can conclude that none of both programs is without chance against the other one. May be, we have to wait for SSDF, but I expect that Shredder-3 will rank among the Top-8. Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.