Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 23:10:12 08/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2005 at 01:57:51, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >Here are some facts to objectify the discussion instead of flaming: > >See following Chess960 position SP-518, you will know it: > >[D]rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 > >SMK-FEN: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w AHah - 0 1 >X-FEN: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 >FEN: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 > >Or look at following playable pseudo-FRC position SP-532 (one of 18 possible): > >[D]rbbnkqnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBNKQNR w KQkq - 0 1 > >SMK-FEN: rbbnkqnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBNKQNR w AHah - 0 1 >X-FEN: rbbnkqnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBNKQNR w KQkq - 0 1 >FEN: rbbnkqnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBBNKQNR w KQkq - 0 1 > Why do so many people want to play Fischer Random or 960? It has no appeal for me. >In both cases the castling tags are making the difference > >Because of FEN and SMK-FEN being different, a decision for SMK-FEN will leave >behind any compatibility to traditional FEN without any need. > >Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.