Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:03:45 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2005 at 04:59:24, Günther Simon wrote: >On August 05, 2005 at 04:07:53, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On August 04, 2005 at 05:20:18, Franz Hagra wrote: >> >>>so it would be better, when >>> >>>classic chess: *.pgn FEN >>> >>>and >>> >>>FRC maybe *.frc FE9 >>> >>>so every "world" would have there own extensions and no more further problems! >>> >>>Hagra >> >> >>This is a very "wrong" or say "stupid" solution. Simply because later in the >>game the positions could be "normal" again. And I ask you why then the positions >>shouldn't be found in the same listing?? > >Both would be still plain ascii, so nothing would prevent one from mixing both >in a few seconds. > >Guenther Two questions more or less. How could it be coded in your view then, that you can see in the headers which sort of game you are dealing with. And second, but this is perhaps a question that shows my own stupidity. What is this when I use FRITZ in ChessBase as engine, when the notation is screwed up with sort of Xx letters. I repeat, it's the exact letter "X". This is when something is wrong against the rules in the moves before? I dont know exactly the rules of 960Chess but could it be that I have already such games in my database and I don't know it? Last one: How would you propose a solution for Eduard, who wants to differ at the instant the two sorts of games? Not that I wanted to seperate the two sorts because for me the middle game is more interesting than openings, and I wouldn't care if the positions were similar but hat their origin in the different variants of chess. - If all that is boring for you please give me certain links. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.