Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:11:31 08/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2005 at 04:08:49, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On August 06, 2005 at 16:54:15, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On August 06, 2005 at 16:45:56, ERIQ wrote: >> >>>I mean will it be able to use two or more processors in the future? >> >>If you donate Fabien a Dual there is a good chance. > >I estimate this chance to 99% (some safety margin for potential health >problems). > >BTW issues are more complicated that you seem to think. When going for >parallel, it's better to have a simple search and bet on eval instead. My >intuition anyway. > >Fabien. In this case it is possible that one cpu fruit will beat 2 cpu fruit thanks to better search that may make one cpu fruit 2 times faster(because it will not be a problem to copy the evaluation from parallel fruit to one cpu fruit but it will be a problem to copy the search algorithm). My intuition anyway(I do not have intuition that tells me something about parallel search and I admit to understand nothing about it but my intuition tells me that better search is important and not only better evaluation). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.