Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: First overnight Toga II 1.0 Blitz results are impressive...

Author: Robert Allgeuer

Date: 13:27:03 08/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 17, 2005 at 13:38:13, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi Uri,
>
>> I believe that I also can do fruit stronger but without motivation of earning
>> money from it I am not going to try.
>
>well, I wonder how your motivation could be earning money, I think those days
>are definitely over where you really can earn something with chess engines. My
>motivation was and is always how far can I get with my OWN code. I do not really
>understand what the motivation can be to do that with another code. You know,
>someone on playchess did compare Fruit & Toga with Coka Cola & Pepsi... I think
>the relation is MUCH nearer, it's more like taking 10l of Coke and put in there
>1ml more suggar. It might taste a bit different (for some even better) but it is
>still the same...
>I agree that it might be still quite easy to improve Fruit by a bit, at least as
>long it is such a young program - in the eval there are for sure still a lot
>parts where you can find improvements. But as long Fabien works so hard on it I
>think this will become more and more complicate. I really hope that in future
>tournaments we all must not be aware of so many clones of whatever source. E.g.
>when Toga or another Fruit clone would participate at CCT or WCCC or whatever I
>would immediately complain at the TD. And if it is not taken out I would refuse
>to play at all. Thanks god that at the moment most tournament rules forbid such
>clones anyway. But in future we might get even more suspicious about every new
>engine of unknown authors which are extremely strong. IMO that is the main
>achievement of Toga - that new authors must prove that there program is
>original. That's somehow sad.
>
>Greets, Thomas


You cannot suspect any new engine - even when strong - to be a clone. In my view
it always has to remain the inverse from what you state: it must be proven that
an engine is a clone, not the other way round, unless there is already strong
evidence present. Also in real life I do not have to prove that I am not a
criminal, unless there is strong evidence against me.

Why should any so-called clone - which is legal because it is GPL - not play in
a tournament officially, if BOTH/ALL authors support this. It is like a joint
venture.

Robert




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.