Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 01:19:58 08/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2005 at 03:06:30, George Speight wrote: >On August 19, 2005 at 00:56:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>>No one said anything was perfect. >> >>But you complained about the imperfections of the existing format... >> >>>Not matter what u do, about half the people >>>wont be satisfied. >> >>With this in mind, what is the point of changing the format? >> >>>Jut offering my opinion. As for my sentence structure, no >>>apologies here. Cant change the way i write. Read it or ignore it. Regards, >>>George >> >>Not saying you should apologize for it, just bare in mind that many people will >>skip reading rather quickly and move on, as it annoys most people, just letting >>you know. >> >>Jonas >Nothing personal towards you. Just offering an opinion. Its just that a RR with >1 cycle doesnt make a lot of sense to me. But whether we agree on something or >not, i hope we can still be friends. Regards, George Thats the point. Not agreeing over a point does not make u enemies, and i think more than helf the people will be satisfied with this answer. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.