Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:55:07 08/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2005 at 21:06:58, Thomas Logan wrote:
>On August 21, 2005 at 19:56:20, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 21, 2005 at 19:48:42, Thomas Logan wrote:
>>
>>>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 40'/40+40'/40+40' 0
>>>
>>> 123456
>>>1 Shredder 9 110011 4.0/6
>>>2 Toga II 1.0 001100 2.0/6
>>>
>>>Its quite early but I do not think we have a Shredder destroyer here
>>>but testing will continue
>>>
>>>IMHO there is no evidence of Shredder being surplanted by a non commercial or a
>>>commercial for that matter
>>>
>>>Zappa if/when released should be an interresting test
>>>
>>>Tom
>>
>>I believe that the same as shredder against Fruit WCCC
>>It is clear that furit WCCC one processor destroyed Shredder 4 processors so
>>probably beating shredder with one processor is no problem for it.
>>
>Hi Uri
>
>It is hard to come to a conclusion based upon 1 game
>
>Factors inhibiting a conclusion
>
>Fruit wcc is not yet available for testing
>
>We do not know what version of Shredder was employed or its reliability
>
>The Fruit which is availble was not superior to Shredder in my testing
>
>So Until another Fruit is made available and proves itself superior I cannot say
>Shredder is surplanted
>
>Tom
Hi Tom
Fruit 2.1 test (40'/40) can be seen at
http://www.utzingerk.com/fruit21_test.htm
also indicates that it is not stronger
than Shredder 9, see test 40'/40 at
http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.