Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 08:34:18 08/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2005 at 05:21:51, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On August 20, 2005 at 23:00:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >Hi Uri, > >>>Fruit2.1 does not like Nc3 by search. > >Interesting. > >>Let me guess that the evaluation was slightly different than public fruit and >>the score for 9.Nc3 was 0.00 > >The only difference is a side-to-move bonus, proposed by Joachim Rang. > >>Let me guess that fruit could play 9.Nbd2 with different contempt score. >>Am I correct? > >I will certainly have a look at all games after the tournament. > >>Note that it seems that this mistake did not change the place of fruit in the >>tournament(second place). > >>Note also that if there are people who put their money on gambling that fruit >>will not finish in the first 4 places based on your words before the tournament >>then you need to apologize. > >Indeed, I am sure that many people are extremely mad at me for underestimating >my own chances like this :) > >Thanks to those who did not believe me! Simply a stupendous and unbelievable result for a single CPU engine. Look at the next Single CPU engine as a function of the Elo that it earned. Congratulations to all participants. I am very happy for the excellent finish. A very good "David and Goliath" like performance for Fruit. But one giant was a bit too tall.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.