Author: Shaley
Date: 02:47:32 08/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2005 at 05:08:41, Uri Blass wrote: >Fruit was tested in more than 2000 games against Fritz and other programs and it >has rating that is better than Fritz8 Bilbao > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html > >You can also download the games. > >see http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/downloads.htm and go down enough in this >page to see lines that begins with "CEGT Fruit2.1..." > >Uri Aright, I've checked the URLs, but there's no information as to what hardware was used, which opening sets of positions were used, etc. The difference between Fritz's and Fruit's ratings is so negligible that I don't think it's a big achievement for Fruit. Which nunn opening test was used as a basis? I can only tell you as a player that I'm not happy with the way Fruit plays. We've seen it long ago in Tigran Petrosyan's games and his era is far, far away. Today's chess is certainly more dynamic and aggressive, therefore Fritz's or Hiarcs's styles tend to be more appealing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.