Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:21:08 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 15:04:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I'm fixing to change the way I number bits to make bit 0 the LSB (as the BSF/BSR >instructions count on the X86) rather than the MSB as the leading zero >instruction counts on the Cray-1 architecture. > >I have four choices for which square bit 0 represents (four logical choices, >anyway, I guess one could number bits randomly should they choose). > >A1 = 0 >H1 = 0 >A8 = 0 >H8 = 0 > >For those of you using bitboards, which did you use? Since it doesn't matter to >me at all, since I am having to rewrite a bunch of stuff to make this work, I >thought I would try to match the most common layout which will make the programs >more compatible if we share any ideas. > >I am leaning toward H1 = 0, H2 = 8, ..., H8 = 56 and A8 = 63, but I've not made >any decision yet... The reason for this is that it is easier to visualize if >you think of the chess board as being composed of the 1 rank and the rightmost 8 >bits of the bitboard, the 2nd rank is the next 8 bits, etc. I am guessing H1=0 is the most popular, because it will line up with FEN and EPD strings. I am doing a survey right now (actually a recursive grep) through the thousands of C and C++ code and header files to find out which enumeration is really the most popular. >The alternative is H8=0, etc, so that the last rank is the rightmost bits, the >seventh rank is the next 8 bits, etc. Anything else requires "mentally >mirroring" so that if A1 or A8 is bit zero, the bits are backward, since A8 is >the left end of a rank, and bit 0 is the right end of a set of 8 bits...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.