Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:29:52 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 18:27:27, Peter Berger wrote: >On August 26, 2005 at 15:36:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 26, 2005 at 15:30:08, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>I want to do some tests with strong chessengines, that can potentially be >>>reproduced on both Windows and Linux systems. Engines should not be more than >>>100 points weaker than Crafty. >>> >>>--- >>> >>>This is the short list of engines I came up with by myself: >>> >>>Deep Sjeng >>>Ruffian >>>Fruit >>>Crafty >>>Yace >>>Comet >>>Glaurung >>> >>>--- >>> >>>Anyone missing here who should or could be included? I hope I missed many. >>> >>>Peter >> >>I'd keep gnuchess in the batch as well... > >Well, it took me _quite_ a while to sense some minor sarcasm here - probably >it's just that I am getting old :) . > >Actually you shouldn't talk to me about some 128-node Linux cluster that can at >times be used for testing Crafty and expect me to not think about effective ways >to use it ;) . > >Cheers >Peter I really wasn't being sarcastic in the least. GNU still plays decent chess. And it can still clean someone's clock if they have a glitch here and there...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.