Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GPL source branch and competing

Author: Robert Hollay

Date: 22:33:31 08/29/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 29, 2005 at 18:17:37, Joshua Shriver wrote:

>
>Curious, I'm all for open source, and even forking projects.  How does the
>credit work when a chess engine forked from another engine competes? Does both
>people get the title?
>
>For example the case of Fruit and Toga, if they both won a tournament say 1st
>and 2nd place, could Fabian say he (in a way) held 1st and 2nd place, or just
>the author of the new branch (or a team win perhaps).
>
>Josh
>
>
>
>>But you could use the old sources (up to 2.1) to improve Toga. If you work
>>hard enough, Toga could be stronger than Fruit commercial.
>>
>>;-)
>>
>>Robert


 Don't know. But there are some other examples around.
E.g. Interbase (the Borland's RDBMS) and Firebird. Interbase 6.0 beta was
open-sourced and those sources were the starting point for the Firebird project.
Later, Interbase 6.X was close-sourced again, but Firebird exists now as an
open-source RDBMS and competes directly with the commercial Interbase.
 Firebird has IPL license (based on MPL), and in the FB documents you cannot
find much words about Interbase.
 However, because of the "clone" status of Toga, I don't think it
will participate in any significant tournaments.
The organizators very likely won't allow that. It would not be fair.

Robert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.