Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:34:15 08/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2005 at 09:27:34, Lieven Clarisse wrote: >On August 30, 2005 at 09:09:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On August 30, 2005 at 08:48:38, paul bedrey wrote: >> >>>On August 30, 2005 at 07:59:50, Shaley wrote: >>> >>>>Of course, the Hydra's hardware seems to be more powerful, so I think this match >>>>will be a win for Hydra with some score advantage, may be 1-1.5 points. >>> >>>At least according to Walter Eigenmann latest list. After 512 games its rated at >>>2864 and S9 at 2702. >> >>Where are those 512 games, no doubt played under valid conditions? >> >>-- >>GCP > >http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/131801.htm Thnaks I see 001 Hydra : 2864 21 55 512 77.1 % 2653 5.9 % 002 Shredder 9 : 2702 6 7 7933 65.1 % 2593 31.4 % 003 Deep Shredder 9 : 2691 25 22 604 56.1 % 2649 33.1 % Note that Deep Shredder9 for a match against shredder by definition use at least 4 processors. I do not believe that Deep Shredder9 with 4 processors is weaker than Shredder9 that can use only single processor. I also suspect that the hardware that was used for shredder is not the best. I cannot take this list as a serious list. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.