Author: James T. Walker
Date: 08:04:42 02/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 1999 at 21:49:27, john c cook wrote: >THE END GAME IS A LOT BETTER I ALLWAY BELIVE THE END GAME OF REBEL10 WAS >WEAK POINT OF REBEL10 BUT NOW IT LOOK A LOT BETTER THIS WAS HOW COME REBEL10 WAS >NOT ON TOP FOR COMPUTER VS COMPUTER GAME >I NOW BELIVE IT WILL BE ON TOP HIARCS7.1 IS THE PROGRAM TO BEAT BECAUSE >IT END GAME WAS BETTER THAN THE OTHER >FRITZ5.32 I BELIVE HAS A VERY BAD END GAME IT IS THE WORST OF TOP 10 >I HAVE SEND IT PLAY SO MANY ENDGAME THAT WERE DRAW AND IT WOULD LOOSE >THE GAME RIGHT NOW I BELIVE > >HIARCS7.1 IS NUMBER 1 >REBEL10.C 2 >FRITZ5.32 3 >I WILL HAVE TO PLAY MORE GAMES REBEL10 VS HAIRCS7.1 >TO SAY THE PROGRAM ARE NOT GM I DO NOT KNOW HOW THEY CAN SAY THIS Hello John, It's pretty obvious you are expressing only a "gut feeling" and you have no data to back up your feelings. That's OK, you are entitled to your opinion and your oninion is welcome here. I myself feel that the Rebel10c is a significant improvement but only after some games are played will we be sure. Right now I have played 2 games against Chessmaster 6000 at a time control of Game/2 hours. Rebel 10c won the first game with white and drew the second with black. This is a good start and the main cause of my enthusiasm for the new Rebel10c. As we all know only 2 games means nothing. It will take many more games and lots of time for the proof. Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.