Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are the top micros playing at GM level?

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 09:05:46 02/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On February 27, 1999 at 17:58:19, Mark Young wrote:

>On February 27, 1999 at 16:19:46, Leon Stancliff wrote:
>
>I find the data interesting, but the ratings data from ICC or any online chess
>server will be skewed. I do not know if you can draw any kind of conclusions
>from them. The are just to many sub pools of rating in ICC.
>1. You have GMs who will play anyone.
>2. You have GMs who only play humans
>3. You have GMs who only play humans or computers they can beat
>4. You have GMs who only play other GM’s or IM at the top of the ICC ratings
>list.
>
>Then you have a similar sub pools of ratings for computer accounts. This makes
>comparing chess strength by chess server ratings almost impossible, between GMs
>and computers, or even GMs to GMs or computers to computers.

Mark,

Why does this matter? In the USCF, you have GMs who will only play in Open
sections, GMs who will only play in Closed sections, and GMs who will play in
any section. Do you make the claim that their USCF rating should be different
based on what type of (equal time, but different types of opponent) tournament
that they used to get their rating? No. You give them their due regardless of
what type of opponents they used to acquire their rating. The same should apply
here.

I have noticed that an A class player in an urban area is usually (not always,
but most of the time) stronger than an A class player in a rural area. This is
probably due to the fact that the urban player gets more opportunities to play a
more diverse group of players. However, the rural player is still class A since
he can beat the B class players in his area 75% of the time. Does the USCF
distinguish between the two. Of course not. Similar to this, the data derived
from the chess servers on GMs vs. computers is still valid enough to draw
conclusions from, regardless of the playing habits of the GMs and programs
involved.

KarinsDad

>
>For Chess server ratings to have any meaning at all, they could not allow
>players to choose whom they will and will not play. This would be very
>unpopular.
>
>Mark Young
>
>
[snip]



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.