Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:18:48 09/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2005 at 19:13:15, Thomas Logan wrote: >On September 09, 2005 at 18:50:01, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On September 09, 2005 at 18:37:39, Thomas Logan wrote: >> >>>To know one in particular >>> >>>Last I looked Shredder is a chessbase engine >>> >>>IMHO no currently widely available engine has surpassed it >>> >>>at classical time control >>> >>>A new Shredder will be out soon >>> >>>Hiarcs 10 is around the corner >>> >>>A beta version of Hiarcs scored 6-4 against Zappa >>> >>>while the results are of limited importance it does show Zappa >>> >>>will not have a cake walk and who knows it may eventually wind up being a >>>chessbase engine. Stranger things have happened >>> >>>And Fruit who knows ? >> >>I predict that Fruit will make a heap of dead bodies in the SSDF that will cause ChessBase to fall silent there as well. > >We will see > >Fruit is among the top few > >It plays about equal to Fritz bilbao at classical time control You speak fo Fruit 2.1. I speak of Fruit WCCC. >and not quite as good as Shredder 9. I think you are wrong. And considering Fabien's rapid progress, I suspect that an SSDF version will gain another 50-100 Elo. >Maybe it will get better, That is certain. >maybe the competition will get better, That is certain. >maybe it will >go commercial as a chessbase engine That is possible. At any rate, the progress of Fruit is such that I think it is probably better on a single CPU than any other chess engine. But it is largely speculation on my part. We will see for sure later. >The possibilities are there definite conclusions I believe are premature Right. For now, we like to prognosticate. >regards > >Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.