Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 22:27:32 09/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2005 at 19:15:05, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Not a very satisfying answer. You did exactly what I forecasted: just to mention >Chessmaster. Not very original. It is done once and again for the >"professionallly minded" poster here. It seems with that they believe all is >done and said. >What's more, I doubt you even read the full post because clearly you did not >consider none of my arguments there. >Even when you does not agree in nothing with the argumentation of other guy, >even when you believe you are the absolute owner of truth, even so some >politeness oblige to do someting better than that kind of reply. >I feel I am entittled to something better than just a derogatory comment in >three words. The ire is not for you (who simply walked into the middle of a room while the programmers were throwing darts at the images of some marketers). If you question the darts while everyone is in full rage, they may throw them at you without thinking. And to some degree you may simply smell the tone of the thread and think it is aimed at you, but the ire is for someone else.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.