Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:22:16 09/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2005 at 09:38:10, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On September 18, 2005 at 14:19:47, Chan Rasjid wrote: > >>I forget something :- >> >>You cannot match a GNU chess with some very basic fundamental flaw (may be >>undiscoverd) at 1000 x nps with a mature good program. 1000x nps that chooses >>a losing line will still lose some games. >> >>So the only proper test must be w/o bugs, ie. >>material + mate vs material + mate + best eval() on planet earth. >> >>Rasjid >I will say this again and again:There was nothing flawed about GNU chess 4 or >the experiment!!! you can say it all you want. But it won't make it true... That's the point you are overlooking...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.