Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: So What does that Kaspy deepblue 2 Result mean then?

Author: Michael J Fitch

Date: 13:17:25 03/04/99

Go up one level in this thread


On March 04, 1999 at 11:18:30, odell hall wrote:

>
>On March 04, 1999 at 09:16:50, Michael J Fitch wrote:
>
>>On March 04, 1999 at 03:08:47, odell hall wrote:
>>
>>>Hi CCC
>>>
>>>  I continue to hear people try and make the victory of deepblue over
>>>Garry Kasp, amount to nothing????   Firstly regardless of the Amount of games
>>>played, When was the last time that anyone beat Garry Kaspy in a match period???
>>> We all know the answer to this question, It is totally, ludicrous to suggest
>>>that this match meant nothing! I continue to hear pathetic excuses , such as
>>>garry kasparov was not in form!  Yet I remember many said the same bull about
>>>him before he defeated Annand. What people are ignoring is that garry kasparov
>>>is such a great player that he can defeat the best even in bad form!!!
>>>I believe these attempts to minimize the victory of deepblue is a pure emotional
>>>reaction, and has little to do which logic or reality.  The fact is, deepblue
>>>defeated kaspy in front of the entire world. This is why the amount of games
>>>played is really irrelevant. Kaspy knew that his reputation was on the line. So
>>>it doesn't matter if it was one game or one hundred!  If he was the better
>>>player he would have been victorious. What makes a world champion , the best in
>>>any sport is his ability to rise to the challenge when something important is on
>>>the line, historically kaspy has been able to come though under pressure. In my
>>>view, this fact is what makes deepblue's victory more credible    If everyone
>>>thinks, and recollects about the pre-match news conferences, kaspy was quite
>>>arrogant, he was sure that he would win the match. Only Grandmaster Joel
>>>benjamin knew that the deepblue kaspy would face was much, much stronger than
>>>kaspy realized. Apparently kaspy did not realize the leap and technical progress
>>>made by the programmers of deepblue.  And when he sat down to play it , I think
>>>he was trumatized, realizing just how strong it was.
>>
>>That match didn't mean anything.Were's Deepblue right now,Probably E-Filing
>>Intel's Tax Returns.It was a 6 game match Man vs Machine THAT'S IT .Kasparov's
>>paranoia got the best of him,After Deepblue made that move he said no computer
>>program would ever make he was completely psyched out,and to keep on ranting and
>>raving about it is silly
>
>No what I think is silly is denying evidence which is right in front of your
>eyes.  I don't know anything about kaspy's alledged "psyched" out, that is for a
>psychologist or psychairtrist to determine, But what we do have that we can see
>is a six game match that deepblue won!. One thing is speculation, another is
>fact.

Can anybody say:PUBLICITY STUNT,STOCK MANIPULATION.TAKE A DEEP BREATH IN -- OUT
JUST RELAX.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.