Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 18:56:11 03/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 1999 at 21:12:40, James Robertson wrote: >Today my program played a game to this position with SSEChess: > >2rq3r/6bk/pPB1b1pp/5p2/2NP1n2/5N2/PP1Q1PP1/2R2RK1 w - - > >Here my program played Nce5? which leads to a forced loss of material after 1. >... Bxe5 Nxe5 Qg5. > >I ran some analysis with my program, and it seems unaware of the impending >disaster because it can push it away with moves like b7 and Qc2. It seems to see >a general decline of the score as time goes on, but still walks into it with >Nce5. My question is: can any (amateur) program avoid Nce5 in less than about 10 >seconds? Crafty switches to Na3 fairly fast, and I'm curious of what other >people will say. > >Currently, on depth 10, my program (it's still thinking!) failed low with Qxf4, >score 125. I wonder what it will say when it finishes depth 10. > >James > > >JR's CP >Version 0.3, 03-04-99 > >level 1 20 0 white go > 1 225 0 233 Nce5 > 2 221 0 1034 Nce5 Nd5 > 3 264 0 3413 Nce5 Nd5 b7 > 4 260 170 17815 Nce5 Bxe5 Nxe5 Qh4 > 5 270 720 89373 Nce5 g5 b7 Rc7 Qb4 > 6 224 3080 349697 Nce5 Bxe5 b7 Rxc6 Rxc6 Bd6 Rxa6 > 7 224 9400 1091111 Nce5 Bxe5 b7 Rxc6 Rxc6 Bd6 Rxa6 > 8 190 36200 4194867 Nce5 Bxe5 b7 Rb8 Nxe5 Qxd4 Qxd4 Ne2+ Kh1 Nxd4 > 9 164 157200 19320933 Nce5 Bxe5 Nxe5 Qg5 Qc2 Nxg2 Nf3 Qg4 b7 If you let it think longer on Nce5, white still has a nice advantage after 1. Nce5 Bxe5 2. Nxe5 Qg5 3. Rfd1! Rxc6 4. Qxf4 Qxf4 5. Rxc6 Bd5 {5. ... Re8 6. b7 Rb8 7. Rxe6 Rxb7 8. Rxa6 Qe4 9. b3 Qe2 10. Rd3 Re7 11. Rd6 Qe1+ 12. Kh2 Qxf2 13. Nxg6} 6. Rc7+ Kg8 7. b7 Bxb7 8. Rxb7 Qe4 9. Ra7 Qc2 10. Re1 Rh7 11. Ra8+ Kg7 12. Rxa6 Qxb2 13. Rxg6+ Kh8 14. d5 Qxa2 Both lines leave white at about +2.5. Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.