Author: Albert Silver
Date: 08:16:48 09/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 09:28:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>Fabien mentioned that Fruit has search bugs(for example it cannot solve Fine70
>in a short time).
>
>It can be productive if the fruit team report when they plan to fix the bugs.
>I see no report on it in future plans of fruit and I see no report if they plan
>to make it as free update or no(tablebase support is mentioned as free update).
>
>fixing bugs is of course included in increasing laying strength but I guess that
>the same is also for tablebase support.
>
>It can be nice if the fruit team report about plans about fixing bugs and about
>implementing known ideas(for example partial extensions or limiting extensions
>because extending every single reply and every check by a single ply does not
>make sense).
>
>Uri
Although I realize that as a programmer it would appear obvious you would be
directly interested in aspects such as the implementation of certain ideas, it
isn't obvious to me because I saw you state elsewhere that you hadn't studied
Fruit's code as you had had no time, though you eventually intended to. If you
haven't look closely at what has already been implemented and how, why the deep
interest in future implementations? After all, with the previous code, you can
see how it was done in precise detail, whereas in the future, even if told so,
you'd only know a certain concept was there, in some form or another.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.