Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:15:50 09/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2005 at 15:05:08, Steve Maughan wrote: >Uri, > >>I do not understand how having upper and lower bound bound can prevent a >>program to solve fine 70 in a short time. > >Neither do I but that's not the issue. > >>There is no contradiction between having a productive change and having a bug >>and a productive change may include a bug. > >Again this is not the issue. > >You're saying that Fruit 2.1 has a "bug" since it cannot solve Fine 70. Yes but I am saying it also because Fabien considers it as a bug. The case of Rebel is different for 2 reasons. 1)I understand why Rebel does not solve it. 2)I never heard that Ed considers it as a bug. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.