Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 05:22:21 03/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 1999 at 01:18:59, Dann Corbit wrote: >This is as close as I can come. It is the same position with two variations. >For both, one move is not a capture: >5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/5r2/P3B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - id "C.A.P.85885"; ce -32759; >pv Bxc2 Qxc2 Rfxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 e4 Qe2# >5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/5r2/P3B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - id "C.A.P.85885"; ce -32759; >pv Bxc2 Qxc2 Rfxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 Rxf2 h4 Qe2# > >Of course you could tweak the position to something like this: >5rk1/2pp2p1/1p4Pp/P4r2/4B3/2B1P3/q1n2nRP/4KR2 w - - >and change the e4 or h4 into a pawn capture instead. The problem with this >position is that after two plies [strikes? ;-)] the outcome is obvious. > >I suspect that some of the regulars here can whip up something a lot more >dramatic. Dann first I might assume that the first thing he will say is what the hell are you talking about, thats if he does not know this type of notation. And by the way he explained what he wanted I would first like to know how he would like the moves represented to him, otherwise all this would be double dutch. But if he can understand this then, do not worry about what I said.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.